State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora vs Kamlesh Alias Kamal Hemraj Gedam — 21/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),118(1),352,351(2). Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHGO010002142026
Next Hearing
21st May 2026
Filing Number
100/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
21/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia
FIR Details
FIR Number
962
Police Station
Tirora
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora
Adv. Chandwani M. S.
Respondent(s)
Kamlesh Alias Kamal Hemraj Gedam
Hearing History
Judge: 41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia
List of Witness
List of Witness
List of Witness
List of Witness
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | List of Witness |
| 29-04-2026 | List of Witness |
| 15-04-2026 | List of Witness |
| 02-04-2026 | List of Witness |
| 01-04-2026 | List of Witness |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application filed by accused Kamlesh @ Kamal Hemraj Gedam under Section 483 of BNSS for Crime No. 962/2025 (involving charges under Sections 103(1), 118(1), 352, 351(2) of BNS for causing death through assault with a steel bracelet) has been rejected and disposed of. The court found prima-facie sufficient evidence against the applicant, including eyewitness testimony, recovery of the weapon at his instance, and a post-mortem report consistent with the prosecution case, and concluded that releasing him on bail at the crucial stage of trial could obstruct justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application filed by accused Kamlesh @ Kamal Hemraj Gedam under Section 483 of BNSS for Crime No. 962/2025 (involving charges under Sections 103(1), 118(1), 352, 351(2) of BNS for causing death through assault with a steel bracelet) has been rejected and disposed of. The court found prima-facie sufficient evidence against the applicant, including eyewitness testimony, recovery of the weapon at his instance, and a post-mortem report consistent with the prosecution case, and concluded that releasing him on bail at the crucial stage of trial could obstruct justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts