State of Maharashtra Through PSO Dugeepar vs Bhimrao Dharma Sontakke. (103( — 20/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHGO010001242025
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
56/2025
Filing Date
27-01-2025
Registration No
20/2025
Registration Date
27-01-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia
FIR Details
FIR Number
356
Police Station
Dugeepar
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Dugeepar
Adv. Chute V.M.
Respondent(s)
Bhimrao Dharma Sontakke. (103(
) Advocate - Bansod D.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Awaiting Muddemal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Bail Application Rejected — The District Court of Gondia denied bail to Bhimrao Dharma Sontake, accused of murdering his wife Sadhana under BNS Section 103(1). The court found prima-facie evidence of guilt, including eyewitness testimony of blood-stained clothing, an extra-judicial confession, medical evidence confirming death from head injuries consistent with a spade attack, and recovered physical evidence. The court rejected bail due to risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering, given that key witnesses are the accused's relatives and the trial has not yet commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Bail Application Rejected — The District Court of Gondia denied bail to Bhimrao Dharma Sontake, accused of murdering his wife Sadhana under BNS Section 103(1). The court found prima-facie evidence of guilt, including eyewitness testimony of blood-stained clothing, an extra-judicial confession, medical evidence confirming death from head injuries consistent with a spade attack, and recovered physical evidence. The court rejected bail due to risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering, given that key witnesses are the accused's relatives and the trial has not yet commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts