State of Maharashtra Through PSO Dugeepar vs Rakesh S/o Baburao Devaikar-03 (POCSO) Advocate - SAGAR J. CHAVHAN — 5/2020
Case under The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,6. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHGO010001202020
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
65/2020
Filing Date
28-01-2020
Registration No
5/2020
Registration Date
28-01-2020
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
35-District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
FIR Details
FIR Number
263
Police Station
Dugeepar
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Dugeepar
Adv. Chandwani M. S.
Respondent(s)
Rakesh S/o Baburao Devaikar-03 (POCSO) Advocate - SAGAR J. CHAVHAN
Harish @ Chetan S/o Devidas Narnaware
Amol S/o Pandurang Narnaware
Bandu S/o Sanjay Lakde
Adv. Shamkuwar Mr. P. S.
Hearing History
Judge: 35-District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 20-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 06-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application of Rakesh in a POCSO gang rape case has been rejected. The court found that despite the applicant's six-year incarceration, there was no change in circumstances since the previous bail rejection, and the applicant poses a risk of tampering with evidence and intimidating witnesses. The case involves serious and heinous offences, with victim and maternal testimony already recorded against the main accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application of Rakesh in a POCSO gang rape case has been rejected. The court found that despite the applicant's six-year incarceration, there was no change in circumstances since the previous bail rejection, and the applicant poses a risk of tampering with evidence and intimidating witnesses. The case involves serious and heinous offences, with victim and maternal testimony already recorded against the main accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts