State of Maharashtra Through PSO Rawanwadi vs Omprakash @ Om s/o. Khileshwar Choudhary-12 Advocate - Rahangdale V. R. — 4/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,120(b),364,386,341,143,144,147,148,149,323,324,294,504,506. Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHGO010000712024
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
36/2024
Filing Date
10-01-2024
Registration No
4/2024
Registration Date
10-01-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.
FIR Details
FIR Number
281
Police Station
Ravanwadi
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Rawanwadi
Adv. Chandwani M. S.
Respondent(s)
Omprakash @ Om s/o. Khileshwar Choudhary-12 Advocate - Rahangdale V. R.
Ajay @ Ajju s/o. Omkar Turkar
Subham @ Raju s/o. Deepchand Thakre
Adv. Rahangdale V. R.
Ashok s/o. Hemraj Thakre
Adv. Rahangdale V. R.
Alok s/o. Durgaprasad Bisen
Adv. Rahangdale V. R.
Vijay s/o. Pannalal Bhorgade
Rohit s/o. Jiyalal Bhorgade
Rohit @ Raju s/o. Arjun Shrisagar
Deepak s/o. Ramprasad Bhorgade
Amol @ Anmol s/o. Jagesh Rahangdale
Ankit s/o.Jeevanlal Harinkhede
Jeevanlal s/o. Mitthanlal Harinkhede
Maheshkumar s/o. Chandanlal Patle
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing
B.W._Unready
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 21-04-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-02-2026 | B.W._Unready |
| 02-02-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary The District Judge rejected the applicant's petition seeking release of a seized scooter (MP-50/SB-1496) and Vivo mobile phone on suprutnama (personal bond). The court found that the applicant failed to file proper documentation—true copies of the scooter's registration certificate and mobile phone bill—and noted that both items constitute valuable evidence in a serious crime case (Crime No. 381/2023) involving multiple IPC sections including murder and kidnapping. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Judge rejected the applicant's petition seeking release of a seized scooter (MP-50/SB-1496) and Vivo mobile phone on suprutnama (personal bond). The court found that the applicant failed to file proper documentation—true copies of the scooter's registration certificate and mobile phone bill—and noted that both items constitute valuable evidence in a serious crime case (Crime No. 381/2023) involving multiple IPC sections including murder and kidnapping. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts