Umashankar S/o. Ashanlal Machhirke vs Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd.-02 Advocate - Ramteke M. B. — 12/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION on 25th March 2026.

M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHGO010000532021

Case disposed

Filing Number

21/2021

Filing Date

13-01-2021

Registration No

12/2021

Registration Date

19-01-2021

Court

District and Session Court , Gondia

Judge

1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Umashankar S/o. Ashanlal Machhirke

Adv. Dasariya V.N.

Respondent(s)

Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd.-02 Advocate - Ramteke M. B.

Sabbir Mustaq Sheikh S/o. Mahebub Sheikh

Adv. Chute V.M.

Bhanusing S/o. Mangalsing Madavi

Adv. Chute V.M.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

25-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Filing of Affidavit

21-01-2026

Filing of Affidavit

19-11-2025

Filing of Affidavit

24-09-2025

Filing of Affidavit

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The MACT, Gondia court disposed of the motor accident compensation petition (MACP No. 12/2021) filed by Umashankar Machhirke against Cholamandal Insurance and others as settled. Both parties reached a compromise through mediation before the DLSA Mediator, and the court approved the settlement terms detailed in Exhibit 21 as binding on both parties, with court fees to be refunded to the claimant as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The MACT, Gondia court disposed of the motor accident compensation petition (MACP No. 12/2021) filed by Umashankar Machhirke against Cholamandal Insurance and others as settled. Both parties reached a compromise through mediation before the DLSA Mediator, and the court approved the settlement terms detailed in Exhibit 21 as binding on both parties, with court fees to be refunded to the claimant as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Gondia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case