Subhash S/o Kailashchandraji Tharad vs Jeetendra S/o Santoshkumar Bhadupotey Thro LR Shashikant S/o Santoshkumar Bhadupotey Advocate - Borkar S.R. — 8/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th April 2026.

M.J.Cases - Misc. Judicial Cases

CNR: MHGO010000492026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-12-2025

Filing Number

23/2026

Filing Date

06-01-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

12-01-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Gondia

Judge

1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Subhash S/o Kailashchandraji Tharad

Adv. Niteshkumar Popat

Respondent(s)

Jeetendra S/o Santoshkumar Bhadupotey Thro LR Shashikant S/o Santoshkumar Bhadupotey Advocate - Borkar S.R.

Vinod S/o Satyanarayan Chourasia Thro LR 2A Sashi Wd/o Vinod Chourasia

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

16-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

Reply/Say

30-03-2026

Reply/Say

18-03-2026

Reply/Say

11-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The District Court of Gondia allowed an application for condonation of a 24-day delay in preferring an appeal against a judgment that rejected the plaintiff's claims for specific performance of contract and refund of money. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, noting the appellant sought legal opinion after the decree and that allowing the appeal would cause no prejudice to respondents, as the right to first appeal is a valuable legal right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Court of Gondia allowed an application for condonation of a 24-day delay in preferring an appeal against a judgment that rejected the plaintiff's claims for specific performance of contract and refund of money. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, noting the appellant sought legal opinion after the decree and that allowing the appeal would cause no prejudice to respondents, as the right to first appeal is a valuable legal right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Gondia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case