Subhash S/o Kailashchandraji Tharad vs Jeetendra S/o Santoshkumar Bhadupotey Thro LR Shashikant S/o Santoshkumar Bhadupotey Advocate - Borkar S.R. — 8/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th April 2026.
M.J.Cases - Misc. Judicial Cases
CNR: MHGO010000492026
e-Filing Number
28-12-2025
Filing Number
23/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
12-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhash S/o Kailashchandraji Tharad
Adv. Niteshkumar Popat
Respondent(s)
Jeetendra S/o Santoshkumar Bhadupotey Thro LR Shashikant S/o Santoshkumar Bhadupotey Advocate - Borkar S.R.
Vinod S/o Satyanarayan Chourasia Thro LR 2A Sashi Wd/o Vinod Chourasia
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 30-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 18-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 11-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Court of Gondia allowed an application for condonation of a 24-day delay in preferring an appeal against a judgment that rejected the plaintiff's claims for specific performance of contract and refund of money. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, noting the appellant sought legal opinion after the decree and that allowing the appeal would cause no prejudice to respondents, as the right to first appeal is a valuable legal right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Court of Gondia allowed an application for condonation of a 24-day delay in preferring an appeal against a judgment that rejected the plaintiff's claims for specific performance of contract and refund of money. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, noting the appellant sought legal opinion after the decree and that allowing the appeal would cause no prejudice to respondents, as the right to first appeal is a valuable legal right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts