State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Mulchera vs Ashok Durgya Kokerwar Advocate - U.S.Galbale — 171/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHGA130003712023
Filing Number
186/2023
Filing Date
22-Jul-2023
Registration No
171/2023
Registration Date
22-Jul-2023
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Aheri
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
07
Police Station
Mulchera
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Mulchera
Adv. DGP/AGP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ashok Durgya Kokerwar Advocate - U.S.Galbale
-
2.Sapnil Ashok Kokerwar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ashok Durgya Kokerwar & Sapnil Ashok Kokerwar (171/2023) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 307 and 507 with Section 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: On January 27, 2023, the complainant alleged that the two defendants attacked him with a hatchet and assaulted him during a dispute. The court examined medical evidence and scene documentation but found the sole prosecution witness (the complainant) unreliable, as he retracted key portions of his statement during cross-examination. Reasoning: The judge concluded no credible evidence established the defendants' intent to cause grievous injury or issue threats, and therefore acquitted them entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
-
11-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
-
14-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
13-May-2025
—
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
20-Feb-2025
—
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
07-Jan-2025
—
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
03-Dec-2024
—
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
03-Oct-2024
—
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
30-Aug-2024
—
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
20-Jul-2024
—
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
03-Jun-2024
—
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
15-Apr-2024
—
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
26-Mar-2024
Charge
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
05-Feb-2024
Charge
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
21-Dec-2023
Charge
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
23-Oct-2023
Charge
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
20-Sep-2023
Charge
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
-
11-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 171/2023
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ashok Durgya Kokerwar & Sapnil Ashok Kokerwar (171/2023) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 307 and 507 with Section 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: On January 27, 2023, the complainant alleged that the two defendants attacked him with a hatchet and assaulted him during a dispute. The court examined medical evidence and scene documentation but found the sole prosecution witness (the complainant) unreliable, as he retracted key portions of his statement during cross-examination. Reasoning: The judge concluded no credible evidence established the defendants' intent to cause grievous injury or issue threats, and therefore acquitted them entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts