Podiya Aytu Kunjam Through On Behalf Of The Ignorant Guardian Father Aytu Ram Kunjam vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Laheri Advocate - DGP/AGP — 11/2026

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd April 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHGA130000742026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

68/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

District and Additional Sessions Court Aheri

Judge

2-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

Police Station

Laheri

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Podiya Aytu Kunjam Through On Behalf Of The Ignorant Guardian Father Aytu Ram Kunjam

Adv. MESHRAM YASHWANT BABURAO

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra through PSO Laheri Advocate - DGP/AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri

02-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Hearing

18-03-2026

Hearing

12-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Podiya Aytu Kunjam v. State of Maharashtra (11/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri allowed an application for condonation of delay filed by a 17-year-old child in conflict with law (through his natural guardian father). The court found sufficient grounds for the delay in filing an appeal against a Juvenile Justice Board order rejecting bail, considering the applicant's poor background, lack of education in the family, residence in Chhattisgarh, and inability to contact legal counsel within the statutory 30-day period. The court condoned the delay and directed registration of the appeal subject to removal of office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Podiya Aytu Kunjam v. State of Maharashtra (11/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri allowed an application for condonation of delay filed by a 17-year-old child in conflict with law (through his natural guardian father). The court found sufficient grounds for the delay in filing an appeal against a Juvenile Justice Board order rejecting bail, considering the applicant's poor background, lack of education in the family, residence in Chhattisgarh, and inability to contact legal counsel within the statutory 30-day period. The court condoned the delay and directed registration of the appeal subject to removal of office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Additional Sessions Court Aheri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case