Podiya Aytu Kunjam Through On Behalf Of The Ignorant Guardian Father Aytu Ram Kunjam vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Laheri Advocate - DGP/AGP — 11/2026
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHGA130000742026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
68/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Aheri
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
Police Station
Laheri
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Podiya Aytu Kunjam Through On Behalf Of The Ignorant Guardian Father Aytu Ram Kunjam
Adv. MESHRAM YASHWANT BABURAO
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Laheri Advocate - DGP/AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 18-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Podiya Aytu Kunjam v. State of Maharashtra (11/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri allowed an application for condonation of delay filed by a 17-year-old child in conflict with law (through his natural guardian father). The court found sufficient grounds for the delay in filing an appeal against a Juvenile Justice Board order rejecting bail, considering the applicant's poor background, lack of education in the family, residence in Chhattisgarh, and inability to contact legal counsel within the statutory 30-day period. The court condoned the delay and directed registration of the appeal subject to removal of office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Podiya Aytu Kunjam v. State of Maharashtra (11/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri allowed an application for condonation of delay filed by a 17-year-old child in conflict with law (through his natural guardian father). The court found sufficient grounds for the delay in filing an appeal against a Juvenile Justice Board order rejecting bail, considering the applicant's poor background, lack of education in the family, residence in Chhattisgarh, and inability to contact legal counsel within the statutory 30-day period. The court condoned the delay and directed registration of the appeal subject to removal of office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts