Atul Ramji Habka vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Bhamragad Advocate - DGP/AGP — 31/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 04th April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHGA130000682026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
62/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Aheri
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
Bhamragad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Atul Ramji Habka
Adv. Ganesh Soma Bogami
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Bhamragad Advocate - DGP/AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
Disposed
Hearing
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 30-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 24-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 20-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.B.A. No. 31/2026 The court granted bail to Atul Ramji Habka, accused of assaulting a woman on January 30, 2026, finding that investigation was complete, the charge sheet had been filed, and he posed no flight risk or criminal history. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 50,000 bond, prohibition on contacting the victim, non-interference with witnesses/evidence, and mandatory court attendance, balancing the victim's safety concerns with the accused's bail eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.B.A. No. 31/2026 The court granted bail to Atul Ramji Habka, accused of assaulting a woman on January 30, 2026, finding that investigation was complete, the charge sheet had been filed, and he posed no flight risk or criminal history. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 50,000 bond, prohibition on contacting the victim, non-interference with witnesses/evidence, and mandatory court attendance, balancing the victim's safety concerns with the accused's bail eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts