Akash Nagayya Kottapelli vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Sironcha Advocate - DGP/AGP — 28/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHGA130000642026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
58/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
28/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Aheri
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
01
Police Station
Sironcha
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Akash Nagayya Kottapelli
Adv. U.S.Galbale
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Sironcha Advocate - DGP/AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 20-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 16-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri Bail.A.No. 28/2026 (Akash v. State of Maharashtra) The Special Court (POCSO Act) rejected Akash's bail application on 27.03.2026. Akash was accused of raping a minor victim with whom he was in a relationship, and of attempting to cause abortion by inserting petrol into her private parts. The court found that the investigation was ongoing, the victim's formal statement under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita remained unrecorded, and there existed serious risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering, justifying continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri Bail.A.No. 28/2026 (Akash v. State of Maharashtra) The Special Court (POCSO Act) rejected Akash's bail application on 27.03.2026. Akash was accused of raping a minor victim with whom he was in a relationship, and of attempting to cause abortion by inserting petrol into her private parts. The court found that the investigation was ongoing, the victim's formal statement under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita remained unrecorded, and there existed serious risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering, justifying continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts