Ajay Kotala Gawade vs State of Maharashtra Through PSO Etapalli Advocate - DGP/AGP — 24/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHGA130000392026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
36/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
24/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Aheri
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
Etapalli
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajay Kotala Gawade
Adv. S.V.Jainwar
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Etapalli Advocate - DGP/AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
Disposed
Order
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Order |
| 23-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 05-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.Bail Appln. No. 24/2026 Court Decision: The court granted bail to Ajay Kotla Gawade, accused of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl, finding the relationship consensual despite the victim's minor status. Key Reasoning: The judge determined that the victim's delayed disclosure (6+ months), her written no-objection to bail, her "sufficient maturity," and the absence of evidence of force/violence indicated consensual relations rather than rape. The court applied precedent permitting leniency in consensual love-affair cases involving young couples, releasing the accused on ₹50,000 bond with conditions not to threaten the victim or her parents and to attend trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.Bail Appln. No. 24/2026 Court Decision: The court granted bail to Ajay Kotla Gawade, accused of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl, finding the relationship consensual despite the victim's minor status. Key Reasoning: The judge determined that the victim's delayed disclosure (6+ months), her written no-objection to bail, her "sufficient maturity," and the absence of evidence of force/violence indicated consensual relations rather than rape. The court applied precedent permitting leniency in consensual love-affair cases involving young couples, releasing the accused on ₹50,000 bond with conditions not to threaten the victim or her parents and to attend trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts