State of Maharashtra vs Tirupati Venkati Jangam 1 Advocate - S.V.Jainwar — 3/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307506b34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHGA130000352023
Filing Number
18/2023
Filing Date
22-07-2023
Registration No
3/2023
Registration Date
22-07-2023
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Aheri
Judge
3-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
Asarali
Year
2008
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Tirupati Venkati Jangam 1 Advocate - S.V.Jainwar
Bapu Venkati Jangam
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: State of Maharashtra v. Tirupati Vyankati Jangam (2023) The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Tirupati Vyankati Jangam of attempted murder charges under IPC Section 307 due to insufficient evidence. Although the case alleged that Tirupati and co-accused Bapu Jangam attacked the informant with a sickle on November 27, 2008, key prosecution witnesses—including the spot panchas and seizure witnesses—failed to support the prosecution's version, and the informant died before trial. The court found no credible evidence linking the accused to the crime and ordered his acquittal with bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: State of Maharashtra v. Tirupati Vyankati Jangam (2023) The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Tirupati Vyankati Jangam of attempted murder charges under IPC Section 307 due to insufficient evidence. Although the case alleged that Tirupati and co-accused Bapu Jangam attacked the informant with a sickle on November 27, 2008, key prosecution witnesses—including the spot panchas and seizure witnesses—failed to support the prosecution's version, and the informant died before trial. The court found no credible evidence linking the accused to the crime and ordered his acquittal with bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts