State of Maharashtra vs Bapu @ Nagraj Vyankati Jangam Advocate - Samaddar Adv. — 1/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 30734. Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHGA130000312023
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
16/2023
Filing Date
22-07-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
22-07-2023
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Aheri
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
Asarali
Year
2007
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A P P
Respondent(s)
Bapu @ Nagraj Vyankati Jangam Advocate - Samaddar Adv.
Ashok @ Kondanna Pocham Kaweri
Swami Chinanna Jangam
Devidas Samayya Kaveri
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge Aheri
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
N.B.W._Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 18-04-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ashok @ Kondanna Pocham Kaveri Outcome: Accused Ashok @ Kondanna Pocham Kaveri was acquitted of charges under Section 307 IPC (attempt to murder). His bail bonds were cancelled and he was set at liberty on personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000. Key Findings: The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient. The injured victim's testimony was vague and omnibus (not specifying which accused used which weapon), and he admitted during cross-examination having no dispute with the accused. The eyewitness account was too vague. Critical evidence—the injury certificate and medical officer testimony—was not presented. The case shall proceed separately against the absconded co-accused Bapu upon his apprehension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ashok @ Kondanna Pocham Kaveri Outcome: Accused Ashok @ Kondanna Pocham Kaveri was acquitted of charges under Section 307 IPC (attempt to murder). His bail bonds were cancelled and he was set at liberty on personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000. Key Findings: The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient. The injured victim's testimony was vague and omnibus (not specifying which accused used which weapon), and he admitted during cross-examination having no dispute with the accused. The eyewitness account was too vague. Critical evidence—the injury certificate and medical officer testimony—was not presented. The case shall proceed separately against the absconded co-accused Bapu upon his apprehension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts