State of Maharashtra through PSO Mulchera vs Prakash Arun Barman Advocate - S.V.Jainwar — 1/2026

Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(R),3(1)(S),3(2)(va). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl.Case

CNR: MHGA130000052026

Filing Number

5/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

District and Additional Sessions Court Aheri

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

108

Police Station

Mulchera

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(R),3(1)(S),3(2)(va)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),351(2)(3),352
Motor Vehicles Act Section 4 (1)/181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Mulchera

    Adv. DGP/AGP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prakash Arun Barman Advocate - S.V.Jainwar

  2. 2.Bhupal Radhakant Mandal

  3. 3.Basantkumar Samelal Jangale

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-May-2026

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Prakash Arun Barman v. State of Maharashtra (1/2026) The court allowed the application and ordered release of the seized motorcycle (MH-33/AE-5149) on supratnama upon furnishing an indemnity bond of ₹50,000. The applicant, the registered owner, was not the accused but the accused had used his motorcycle. The court found no useful purpose in retaining the motorcycle with police until trial conclusion, especially since the actual vehicles used in the alleged offense (tractor and trolley) were already released. Release was granted subject to strict conditions: no modification, sale, or transfer without court permission; production before court/investigating officer when required; no illegal use; submission of registration and insurance documents; and preparation of panchanama before return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Order

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 27-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 27-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  11. 23-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  12. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  13. 05-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  14. 21-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  15. 11-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  16. 04-Feb-2026

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  17. 03-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 03-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  19. 29-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  20. 23-Jan-2026

    Production of Accused

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  21. 21-Jan-2026

    Production of Accused

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  22. 20-Jan-2026

    Production of Accused

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  23. 19-Jan-2026

    Order

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  24. 17-Jan-2026

    Order

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  25. 16-Jan-2026

    Order

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  26. 15-Jan-2026

    Order

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  27. 13-Jan-2026

    Order

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  28. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri

  29. 08-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Prakash Arun Barman v. State of Maharashtra (1/2026) The court allowed the application and ordered release of the seized motorcycle (MH-33/AE-5149) on supratnama upon furnishing an indemnity bond of ₹50,000. The applicant, the registered owner, was not the accused but the accused had used his motorcycle. The court found no useful purpose in retaining the motorcycle with police until trial conclusion, especially since the actual vehicles used in the alleged offense (tractor and trolley) were already released. Release was granted subject to strict conditions: no modification, sale, or transfer without court permission; production before court/investigating officer when required; no illegal use; submission of registration and insurance documents; and preparation of panchanama before return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case