State of Maharashtra through PSO Mulchera vs Prakash Arun Barman Advocate - S.V.Jainwar — 1/2026
Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(R),3(1)(S),3(2)(va). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
Spl.Case
CNR: MHGA130000052026
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
5/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Aheri
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
FIR Details
FIR Number
108
Police Station
Mulchera
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Mulchera
Adv. DGP/AGP
Respondent(s)
Prakash Arun Barman Advocate - S.V.Jainwar
Bhupal Radhakant Mandal
Basantkumar Samelal Jangale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Aheri
Appearance
Appearance
Order
Appearance
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Appearance |
| 15-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 10-04-2026 | Order |
| 27-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 25-03-2026 | Order |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Prakash Arun Barman v. State of Maharashtra (1/2026) The court allowed the application and ordered release of the seized motorcycle (MH-33/AE-5149) on supratnama upon furnishing an indemnity bond of ₹50,000. The applicant, the registered owner, was not the accused but the accused had used his motorcycle. The court found no useful purpose in retaining the motorcycle with police until trial conclusion, especially since the actual vehicles used in the alleged offense (tractor and trolley) were already released. Release was granted subject to strict conditions: no modification, sale, or transfer without court permission; production before court/investigating officer when required; no illegal use; submission of registration and insurance documents; and preparation of panchanama before return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Prakash Arun Barman v. State of Maharashtra (1/2026) The court allowed the application and ordered release of the seized motorcycle (MH-33/AE-5149) on supratnama upon furnishing an indemnity bond of ₹50,000. The applicant, the registered owner, was not the accused but the accused had used his motorcycle. The court found no useful purpose in retaining the motorcycle with police until trial conclusion, especially since the actual vehicles used in the alleged offense (tractor and trolley) were already released. Release was granted subject to strict conditions: no modification, sale, or transfer without court permission; production before court/investigating officer when required; no illegal use; submission of registration and insurance documents; and preparation of panchanama before return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts