Chintaman Kashiram Sakhare vs Shivdas Rama Baraikar Advocate - A.P.Nakade — 8/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,39. Status: Compromise. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHGA110003142023

Compromise

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

47/2023

Filing Date

13-07-2023

Registration No

8/2023

Registration Date

13-07-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kurkheda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC Kurkheda

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37,39

Petitioner(s)

Chintaman Kashiram Sakhare

Adv. P.N.Buddhe

Respondent(s)

Shivdas Rama Baraikar Advocate - A.P.Nakade

Rekha Shivdas Baraikar

Gram Panchayat, Yengalkheda through Secretory @ Sarpanch

Block Development Officer, Pachayat Samiti, Kurkheda

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. JMFC Kurkheda

08-05-2026

Compromise

07-05-2026

Arguments

05-05-2026

Arguments

30-04-2026

Arguments

27-04-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

29-08-2024
Issues

Case Summary: 8/2023 Case: Chintaman Kashiram Sakhare v. Shivdas Rama Baraikar & Others Outcome: This is a civil property dispute case. The court document dated 29/08/2024 sets out six issues for determination regarding a shared boundary wall between the petitioner's property (No. 308, Yengalkheda) and the respondents' property (No. 260), allegations of unauthorized construction on the shared wall, and claims of water encroachment. The case has been framed for trial with specific issues identified but no final order/judgment has been issued in this document—it represents the issue formulation stage of the civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 8/2023 Case: Chintaman Kashiram Sakhare v. Shivdas Rama Baraikar & Others Outcome: This is a civil property dispute case. The court document dated 29/08/2024 sets out six issues for determination regarding a shared boundary wall between the petitioner's property (No. 308, Yengalkheda) and the respondents' property (No. 260), allegations of unauthorized construction on the shared wall, and claims of water encroachment. The case has been framed for trial with specific issues identified but no final order/judgment has been issued in this document—it represents the issue formulation stage of the civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kurkheda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case