Bhaurao Shravan Nikhade vs Gajanan Maroti Nikhade Advocate - N.U.Lodalliwar — 84/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGA090019872025
e-Filing Number
18-12-2025
Filing Number
179/2025
Filing Date
19-Dec-2025
Registration No
84/2025
Registration Date
19-Dec-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhaurao Shravan Nikhade
Adv. SATPUTE KEMAJI TULSHIRAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.Gajanan Maroti Nikhade Advocate - N.U.Lodalliwar
-
2.Sudhakar Maroti Thengane
-
3.Shamrao Kashinath Gaurkar
-
4.Tataji Baburao Potraje
-
5.Baban Kashinath Gaurkar
-
6.Lomesh Ram Gaurkar
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-May-2026
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
29-Apr-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
16-Apr-2026
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
30-Mar-2026
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Bhaurao Shravan Nikhade v. Gajanan Maroti Nikhade (84/2025) The plaintiff sought a temporary injunction to prevent defendants from removing a wire compound around his property (survey no. 204/2, 1.90 hectares, Gadchiroli). The court rejected the application on March 13, 2026, finding the plaintiff failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case, as there was no evidence defendants actually obstructed the structure and the Tahasildar's removal order was directed at the plaintiff, not defendants; (2) irreparable loss, since the dispute concerns the compound's location—a matter for trial—and monetary compensation was adequate; and (3) balance of convenience favoring defendants' access to their fields. The case proceeds to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
26-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
12-Feb-2026
Citation
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
29-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
22-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
15-Jan-2026
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
09-Jan-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
-
20-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
20-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
20-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 84/2025
Case Summary: Bhaurao Shravan Nikhade v. Gajanan Maroti Nikhade (84/2025) The plaintiff sought a temporary injunction to prevent defendants from removing a wire compound around his property (survey no. 204/2, 1.90 hectares, Gadchiroli). The court rejected the application on March 13, 2026, finding the plaintiff failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case, as there was no evidence defendants actually obstructed the structure and the Tahasildar's removal order was directed at the plaintiff, not defendants; (2) irreparable loss, since the dispute concerns the compound's location—a matter for trial—and monetary compensation was adequate; and (3) balance of convenience favoring defendants' access to their fields. The case proceeds to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts