Devnath Ishwar Pendorkar vs State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Chamorshi Advocate - APP — 257/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHGA090019762025
e-Filing Number
11-12-2025
Filing Number
1807/2025
Filing Date
16-12-2025
Registration No
257/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
470
Police Station
Chamorshi
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Devnath Ishwar Pendorkar
Adv. UNDIRWADE DIMPAL GAJANAN
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Chamorshi Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 05-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 26-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Devnath Ishwar Pendorkar's application to release his seized Suzuki Access 125 two-wheeler (Crime No. 470/2025 under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections 65(a), 98, 83). Despite prosecution opposition citing investigation continuation and reoffence risk, the magistrate granted release on an indemnity bond of ₹40,000 with conditions that the applicant not sell/transfer the vehicle, maintain it properly, produce it when required, and not use it in any offence. Custody remains interim pending trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed Devnath Ishwar Pendorkar's application to release his seized Suzuki Access 125 two-wheeler (Crime No. 470/2025 under Maharashtra Prohibition Act sections 65(a), 98, 83). Despite prosecution opposition citing investigation continuation and reoffence risk, the magistrate granted release on an indemnity bond of ₹40,000 with conditions that the applicant not sell/transfer the vehicle, maintain it properly, produce it when required, and not use it in any offence. Custody remains interim pending trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts