Gaurav Jitendra Bhashakhetre vs State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Chamorshi Advocate - APP — 230/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHGA090017692025
e-Filing Number
10-11-2025
Filing Number
1611/2025
Filing Date
12-11-2025
Registration No
230/2025
Registration Date
12-11-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
337
Police Station
Chamorshi
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gaurav Jitendra Bhashakhetre
Adv. T.G.Bharre
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Chamorshi Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
Disposed
Hearing
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 20-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 29-01-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed applicant Gaurav Jitendra Bhashakhetre's petition under Section 503 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita to release his seized Hyundai Accent vehicle (MH 34 AA 2040), finding no ongoing investigation needed the vehicle and that keeping it would cause deterioration. The vehicle was released on execution of a ₹1,50,000 indemnity bond with conditions that he produce it when required, not transfer it, not tamper with it, and not use it for offences, while the investigating officer was directed to prepare detailed panchanama with photographs for the charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed applicant Gaurav Jitendra Bhashakhetre's petition under Section 503 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita to release his seized Hyundai Accent vehicle (MH 34 AA 2040), finding no ongoing investigation needed the vehicle and that keeping it would cause deterioration. The vehicle was released on execution of a ₹1,50,000 indemnity bond with conditions that he produce it when required, not transfer it, not tamper with it, and not use it for offences, while the investigating officer was directed to prepare detailed panchanama with photographs for the charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts