Gaurav Jitendra Bhashakhetre vs State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Chamorshi Advocate - APP — 230/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHGA090017692025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-11-2025

Filing Number

1611/2025

Filing Date

12-11-2025

Registration No

230/2025

Registration Date

12-11-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi

Judge

10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

337

Police Station

Chamorshi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Gaurav Jitendra Bhashakhetre

Adv. T.G.Bharre

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Chamorshi Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Hearing

24-02-2026

Reply/Say

20-02-2026

Reply/Say

29-01-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed applicant Gaurav Jitendra Bhashakhetre's petition under Section 503 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita to release his seized Hyundai Accent vehicle (MH 34 AA 2040), finding no ongoing investigation needed the vehicle and that keeping it would cause deterioration. The vehicle was released on execution of a ₹1,50,000 indemnity bond with conditions that he produce it when required, not transfer it, not tamper with it, and not use it for offences, while the investigating officer was directed to prepare detailed panchanama with photographs for the charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed applicant Gaurav Jitendra Bhashakhetre's petition under Section 503 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita to release his seized Hyundai Accent vehicle (MH 34 AA 2040), finding no ongoing investigation needed the vehicle and that keeping it would cause deterioration. The vehicle was released on execution of a ₹1,50,000 indemnity bond with conditions that he produce it when required, not transfer it, not tamper with it, and not use it for offences, while the investigating officer was directed to prepare detailed panchanama with photographs for the charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case