State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Ashti vs Devashish Ganesh Mandal and Two Advocate - Siddique Mansuri — 206/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 325,3(5). Status: Documents. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA090014602025
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
1329/2025
Filing Date
22-09-2025
Registration No
206/2025
Registration Date
22-09-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
FIR Details
FIR Number
138
Police Station
Ashti
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Ashti
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Devashish Ganesh Mandal and Two Advocate - Siddique Mansuri
Mohammad Mehamud Sarvar Ali
Adv. Siddique Mansuri
Umaji Bakkaji Kaliwar
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
Documents
Documents
Documents
Documents
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Documents |
| 16-03-2026 | Documents |
| 13-03-2026 | Documents |
| 12-03-2026 | Documents |
| 11-03-2026 | Order |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Devashish Ganesh Mandal (RCC 206/2025) The application for vehicle release was allowed. The court granted interim custody of the seized Mahindra vehicle to the applicant on execution of a Rs. 7,00,000 indemnity bond, with conditions including depositing Rs. 200 per live cattle for 10 days, producing the vehicle when required, and refraining from transfer or misuse. The applicant must also bear costs for animal transport and maintenance during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Devashish Ganesh Mandal (RCC 206/2025) The application for vehicle release was allowed. The court granted interim custody of the seized Mahindra vehicle to the applicant on execution of a Rs. 7,00,000 indemnity bond, with conditions including depositing Rs. 200 per live cattle for 10 days, producing the vehicle when required, and refraining from transfer or misuse. The applicant must also bear costs for animal transport and maintenance during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts