State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Regadi vs Gangadhar Maroti Madavi — 694/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA090011312025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1015/2025

Filing Date

07-08-2025

Registration No

694/2025

Registration Date

07-08-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Regadi

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Gangadhar Maroti Madavi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

12-03-2026

Disposed

21-01-2026

Evidence

01-01-2026

Evidence

27-11-2025

Evidence

16-10-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 694/2025 State of Maharashtra v. Gangadhar Maroti Madavi The court acquitted the accused Gangadhar Maroti Madavi of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Liquor Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence. While foreign liquor bottles were recovered from the accused's residence during a police raid on 28-05-2025, the prosecution failed to establish the case through credible witness testimony, as both prosecution witnesses could not provide consistent or corroborative evidence linking the accused to illegal liquor trafficking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 694/2025 State of Maharashtra v. Gangadhar Maroti Madavi The court acquitted the accused Gangadhar Maroti Madavi of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Liquor Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence. While foreign liquor bottles were recovered from the accused's residence during a police raid on 28-05-2025, the prosecution failed to establish the case through credible witness testimony, as both prosecution witnesses could not provide consistent or corroborative evidence linking the accused to illegal liquor trafficking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case