State of Maharashtra P. S. Chamorshi vs Rohit Ambadas Dhakate and others Advocate - P.C.Sammaddar, P.M.Dhait — 81/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409,420,201,465,467,468,471,477(A),34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA090010792017
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
935/2017
Filing Date
30-10-2017
Registration No
81/2017
Registration Date
30-10-2017
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
FIR Details
FIR Number
0076
Police Station
Gadchiroli
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra P. S. Chamorshi
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rohit Ambadas Dhakate and others Advocate - P.C.Sammaddar, P.M.Dhait
Ripan Gopal Hajra
Adv. V.G.Chilange
Madav Balram Gharami
Adv. P.M.Dhait
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 81/2017 Outcome: Application Rejected (22 November 2023) Pranita Rohit Dhakate (widow of deceased accused Rohit Dhakate) sought permission to sell a duplex property seized during investigation of an economic offence involving Rs. 63,93,621 misappropriation. The court rejected her application, holding that since the trial remains pending and it cannot yet be determined whether the property was purchased from misappropriated funds, permission to dispose cannot be granted until final judgment concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 81/2017 Outcome: Application Rejected (22 November 2023) Pranita Rohit Dhakate (widow of deceased accused Rohit Dhakate) sought permission to sell a duplex property seized during investigation of an economic offence involving Rs. 63,93,621 misappropriation. The court rejected her application, holding that since the trial remains pending and it cannot yet be determined whether the property was purchased from misappropriated funds, permission to dispose cannot be granted until final judgment concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts