State of Maharashtra through P.S.P. Chamorshi vs Bandu Junkaji Kohapare and 2 Advocate - R.W.Sakinlawar — 88/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA090007882022
Filing Number
705/2022
Filing Date
01-10-2022
Registration No
88/2022
Registration Date
01-10-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
422
Police Station
Chamorshi
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through P.S.P. Chamorshi
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Bandu Junkaji Kohapare and 2 Advocate - R.W.Sakinlawar
Pravin Balaji Kohpare
Varsha Bandu Kohapare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bandu Junkaji Kohapare (88/2022) The court acquitted all three accused—Bandu Junkaji Kohapare, Pravin Balaji Kohapare, and Varsha Bandu Kohapare—of charges under IPC Sections 324 and 504 with Section 34. The court found the prosecution's evidence, including witness testimony and injury reports, contradictory and unreliable, with key witnesses providing conflicting accounts of the alleged incident that occurred on September 22, 2021. The medical evidence regarding injury severity also failed to corroborate the prosecution's case sufficiently to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bandu Junkaji Kohapare (88/2022) The court acquitted all three accused—Bandu Junkaji Kohapare, Pravin Balaji Kohapare, and Varsha Bandu Kohapare—of charges under IPC Sections 324 and 504 with Section 34. The court found the prosecution's evidence, including witness testimony and injury reports, contradictory and unreliable, with key witnesses providing conflicting accounts of the alleged incident that occurred on September 22, 2021. The medical evidence regarding injury severity also failed to corroborate the prosecution's case sufficiently to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts