PRAKASH SOMAJI SONTAKKE vs ISHWAR MAROTI NAWALE Advocate - K.T.Satpute — 54/2024

Case Summary: Reg.C.S. No.54/2024 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction was rejected/dismissed. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss required for interim relief. The court noted a critical contradiction: the plaintiff claimed the defendant encroached on the property (implying plaintiff lacks possession) while simultaneously seeking relief to restrain disturbance of his possession. Since the plaintiff admitted not being in possession, the court held no temporary injunction could be granted. Both parties were directed to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.