State of Maharashtra through P.S. Chamorshi vs Mukesh Thakurpad Roy Advocate - N.U.Lodalliwar — 46/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498-A,494,323,504,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA090005482023

Evidence

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

Filing Number

492/2023

Filing Date

23-06-2023

Registration No

46/2023

Registration Date

23-06-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi

Judge

10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

FIR Details

FIR Number

103

Police Station

Chamorshi

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498-A,494,323,504,34

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through P.S. Chamorshi

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Mukesh Thakurpad Roy Advocate - N.U.Lodalliwar

Sau. Arpana Thakurpad Roy

Thakurpat Rhudaynath Roy

Sau. Champa Santosh Havladar

Santosh Nityanand Havladar

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

07-05-2026

Evidence

02-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

05-02-2026

Evidence

08-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

28-06-2024
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 46/2023 Outcome: The discharge application was rejected. Accused nos. 4 and 5 (Arpana Thakurpad Roy and Thakurpad Rhudaynath Roy) will remain charged under IPC sections 498-A, 494, 323, 504, and 506 read with section 34. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence that the accused collectively demanded dowry (Rs. 7 lakh) from the informant and physically abused her upon non-fulfillment. The 3-year delay in filing the complaint was not fatal as cruelty constitutes a continuous offense under CrPC section 472. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 46/2023 Outcome: The discharge application was rejected. Accused nos. 4 and 5 (Arpana Thakurpad Roy and Thakurpad Rhudaynath Roy) will remain charged under IPC sections 498-A, 494, 323, 504, and 506 read with section 34. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence that the accused collectively demanded dowry (Rs. 7 lakh) from the informant and physically abused her upon non-fulfillment. The 3-year delay in filing the complaint was not fatal as cruelty constitutes a continuous offense under CrPC section 472. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case