Dilip Narayan Zode vs Suresh Narayan Zode Advocate - P.M.Dhait — 17/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGA090005132022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
50/2022
Filing Date
01-07-2022
Registration No
17/2022
Registration Date
01-07-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dilip Narayan Zode
Adv. K.T.Satpute
Respondent(s)
Suresh Narayan Zode Advocate - P.M.Dhait
Sadashiv Narayan Zode
Adv. P.M.Dhait
Anil Sadashiv Wadhai
Adv. P.M.Dhait
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 17/2022 Outcome: Temporary injunction application ALLOWED. The court restrained defendants from disturbing plaintiff Dilip Narayan Zode's possession of the disputed agricultural property (Survey No. 374/2, 1.51 hectares at Konsari, Gadchiroli) pending final decision of the suit. The court found plaintiff established prima facie case, balance of convenience favored plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result without injunction. The validity of the contested Will dated 29/11/2019 and defendants' claims regarding prior partition remain to be decided at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 17/2022 Outcome: Temporary injunction application ALLOWED. The court restrained defendants from disturbing plaintiff Dilip Narayan Zode's possession of the disputed agricultural property (Survey No. 374/2, 1.51 hectares at Konsari, Gadchiroli) pending final decision of the suit. The court found plaintiff established prima facie case, balance of convenience favored plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result without injunction. The validity of the contested Will dated 29/11/2019 and defendants' claims regarding prior partition remain to be decided at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts