State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Ashti vs Prashant Mulidhar Bhagat — 256/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA090004182026

Filing Number

388/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

256/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi

Judge

10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Ashti

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Ashti

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Prashant Mulidhar Bhagat

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Prashant Mulidhar Bhagat (256/2026) The court convicted respondent Prashant Mulidhar Bhagat under IPC Section 285 for rash driving of vehicle MH-34-BP-1308 on 11/03/2026 between 18:30-19:20 hours near Ashti, which created danger to public life. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 1,000 with default imprisonment of 10 days, after the accused admitted guilt and cooperated with authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
12-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
12-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 256/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Prashant Mulidhar Bhagat (256/2026) The court convicted respondent Prashant Mulidhar Bhagat under IPC Section 285 for rash driving of vehicle MH-34-BP-1308 on 11/03/2026 between 18:30-19:20 hours near Ashti, which created danger to public life. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 1,000 with default imprisonment of 10 days, after the accused admitted guilt and cooperated with authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.