State of Maharashtra through PSO Ashti vs Dadaji Ganu Wetti Advocate - A.J.Undirwade — 176/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA090003892023

Filing Number

338/2023

Filing Date

09-May-2023

Registration No

176/2023

Registration Date

09-May-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

273

Police Station

Ashti

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Ashti

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dadaji Ganu Wetti Advocate - A.J.Undirwade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Case 176/2023 Summary The court acquitted accused Dadaji Ganu Wetti of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(E)) for alleged unlawful possession and manufacture of liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case through credible witness testimony—the two witnesses examined did not provide substantive support for the charges, and the court found the evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and a bond surety of Rs. 15,000 was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  9. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  10. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  11. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  12. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  13. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  14. 15-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  15. 30-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  16. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  17. 30-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  18. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  19. 18-May-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  20. 15-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  21. 07-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  22. 13-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  23. 15-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  24. 27-Nov-2023

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  25. 06-Oct-2023

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  26. 10-Aug-2023

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  27. 03-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 09-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 176/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 176/2023 Summary The court acquitted accused Dadaji Ganu Wetti of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(E)) for alleged unlawful possession and manufacture of liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case through credible witness testimony—the two witnesses examined did not provide substantive support for the charges, and the court found the evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and a bond surety of Rs. 15,000 was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case