State of Maharashtra through PSO Ashti vs Dadaji Ganu Wetti Advocate - A.J.Undirwade — 176/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA090003892023

Case disposed

Filing Number

338/2023

Filing Date

09-05-2023

Registration No

176/2023

Registration Date

09-05-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

273

Police Station

Ashti

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through PSO Ashti

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Dadaji Ganu Wetti Advocate - A.J.Undirwade

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

24-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

20-01-2026

Evidence

09-12-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case 176/2023 Summary The court acquitted accused Dadaji Ganu Wetti of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(E)) for alleged unlawful possession and manufacture of liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case through credible witness testimony—the two witnesses examined did not provide substantive support for the charges, and the court found the evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and a bond surety of Rs. 15,000 was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 176/2023 Summary The court acquitted accused Dadaji Ganu Wetti of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(E)) for alleged unlawful possession and manufacture of liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case through credible witness testimony—the two witnesses examined did not provide substantive support for the charges, and the court found the evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and a bond surety of Rs. 15,000 was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case