State of Maharashtra through PSO Ashti vs Dadaji Ganu Wetti Advocate - A.J.Undirwade — 176/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA090003892023
Filing Number
338/2023
Filing Date
09-05-2023
Registration No
176/2023
Registration Date
09-05-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
273
Police Station
Ashti
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Ashti
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Dadaji Ganu Wetti Advocate - A.J.Undirwade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 176/2023 Summary The court acquitted accused Dadaji Ganu Wetti of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(E)) for alleged unlawful possession and manufacture of liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case through credible witness testimony—the two witnesses examined did not provide substantive support for the charges, and the court found the evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and a bond surety of Rs. 15,000 was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 176/2023 Summary The court acquitted accused Dadaji Ganu Wetti of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(E)) for alleged unlawful possession and manufacture of liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case through credible witness testimony—the two witnesses examined did not provide substantive support for the charges, and the court found the evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and a bond surety of Rs. 15,000 was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts