Vimalbai Sukhadev Chaudhari vs Nil — 25/2024

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHGA090003772024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-08-2024

Filing Number

76/2024

Filing Date

05-08-2024

Registration No

25/2024

Registration Date

05-08-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi

Judge

10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII

Petitioner(s)

Vimalbai Sukhadev Chaudhari

Adv. UNDIRWADE ANANT JAGANNATH

Nishikant Sukhadev Chaudhari

Adv. UNDIRWADE ANANT JAGANNATH

Ramesh Sukhadev Chaudhari

Adv. UNDIRWADE ANANT JAGANNATH

Respondent(s)

Nil

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

23-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Hearing

11-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Dismissal Order

11-02-2026

Dismissal Order

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: The Joint Civil Judge at Chamorshi granted a Heirship Certificate to Vimalbai Sukhadev Chaudhari (widow) and her two sons, Nishikant and Ramesh, recognizing them as legal heirs of deceased Sukhadev Gopinath Choudhari (died 22/12/2022) under the Bombay Regulation Act VIII of 1827. The court found unchallenged evidence supporting their claim and issued the certificate to enable them to access pension schemes and government employment benefits, noting the certificate does not confer property rights but merely establishes their status as legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Joint Civil Judge at Chamorshi granted a Heirship Certificate to Vimalbai Sukhadev Chaudhari (widow) and her two sons, Nishikant and Ramesh, recognizing them as legal heirs of deceased Sukhadev Gopinath Choudhari (died 22/12/2022) under the Bombay Regulation Act VIII of 1827. The court found unchallenged evidence supporting their claim and issued the certificate to enable them to access pension schemes and government employment benefits, noting the certificate does not confer property rights but merely establishes their status as legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case