Naresh Gajanan Chichaghare vs State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Ashti Advocate - APP — 55/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHGA090003552026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

327/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Ashti

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Naresh Gajanan Chichaghare

    Adv. P.J.Ghongde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Ashti Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed Naresh Gajanan Chichaghare's application for release of his seized Mahindra Scorpio vehicle, finding him to be the registered owner with no competing claims. The vehicle was released on executing a ₹10,00,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, or use in any offense, and requiring production on demand. The prosecution retains liberty to invoke the bond for breach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Naresh Gajanan Chichaghare's application for release of his seized Mahindra Scorpio vehicle, finding him to be the registered owner with no competing claims. The vehicle was released on executing a ₹10,00,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, or use in any offense, and requiring production on demand. The prosecution retains liberty to invoke the bond for breach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case