Promath Dhirendra Mandal vs State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Ashti Advocate - APP — 54/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHGA090003512026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

323/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi

Judge

10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Promath Dhirendra Mandal

    Adv. Shrikrushna Vithoba Chilange

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Ashti Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court allowed Promath Dhirendra Mandal's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to release Rs. 30,000 fraudulently transferred from his SBI account and frozen in a Union Bank account. The Investigating Officer and Prosecution had no objection to the release, provided the applicant executed an indemnity bond for the amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Promath Dhirendra Mandal's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to release Rs. 30,000 fraudulently transferred from his SBI account and frozen in a Union Bank account. The Investigating Officer and Prosecution had no objection to the release, provided the applicant executed an indemnity bond for the amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case