Ranjana Bhauji Hichami vs State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Regadi Advocate - APP — 49/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHGA090003412026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
316/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
49/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ranjana Bhauji Hichami
Adv. P.M.Dhait
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Regadi Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 04-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri. M.A. No. 49/2026 The court allowed Ranjana Bhauji Hichami's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for release of her deceased father's seized two-wheeler (Hero H.F. Deluxe, Reg. No. MH/33/U.-8436). The vehicle was seized in animal cruelty case Crime No. 26/2025 but was standing unused at police station. The court ordered its return pending trial upon execution of a ₹40,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, or misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Cri. M.A. No. 49/2026 The court allowed Ranjana Bhauji Hichami's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for release of her deceased father's seized two-wheeler (Hero H.F. Deluxe, Reg. No. MH/33/U.-8436). The vehicle was seized in animal cruelty case Crime No. 26/2025 but was standing unused at police station. The court ordered its return pending trial upon execution of a ₹40,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, or misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts