State of Maharashtra through P.S.O., Chamorshi vs Ramesh Ramlu Kotgilwar Advocate - V.G.Chilange — 112/2019
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA090003192019
Filing Number
257/2019
Filing Date
27-05-2019
Registration No
112/2019
Registration Date
27-05-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
65
Police Station
Gadchiroli
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through P.S.O., Chamorshi
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Ramlu Kotgilwar Advocate - V.G.Chilange
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 24-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 18-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 16-04-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Case 112/2019 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate at Chamorshi acquitted accused Ramesh Ramlu Kotgilwar of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition of Dacoity Act, Section 65(i), finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the seizure of alleged contraband (rocket-propelled explosives and illicit liquor) lacked credible corroboration, witness testimony was unreliable, and the chain of custody was compromised, making it impossible to conclusively prove the accused's culpability in the alleged unlawful possession and transport offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Case 112/2019 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate at Chamorshi acquitted accused Ramesh Ramlu Kotgilwar of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition of Dacoity Act, Section 65(i), finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the seizure of alleged contraband (rocket-propelled explosives and illicit liquor) lacked credible corroboration, witness testimony was unreliable, and the chain of custody was compromised, making it impossible to conclusively prove the accused's culpability in the alleged unlawful possession and transport offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts