Dipak Nutan Thakkar vs State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Ashti Advocate - APP — 43/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHGA090002962026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
274/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
43/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
373
Police Station
Ashti
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dipak Nutan Thakkar
Adv. SATPUTE KEMAJI TULSHIRAM
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Ashti Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chamorshi
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Deepak Nutan Thakkar's application for release of his seized OnePlus 7 Pro mobile phone under section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that although the phone was seized in a cybercrime case (involving alleged cheating of Rs. 44,45,500), the Investigating Officer's explanation confirmed the device was not required for data collection, and the phone would deteriorate if kept unused at the police station. The court ordered release of the mobile upon execution of a Rs. 10,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the applicant cannot sell, transfer, or use it further in any offense, and must produce it whenever required during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed Deepak Nutan Thakkar's application for release of his seized OnePlus 7 Pro mobile phone under section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that although the phone was seized in a cybercrime case (involving alleged cheating of Rs. 44,45,500), the Investigating Officer's explanation confirmed the device was not required for data collection, and the phone would deteriorate if kept unused at the police station. The court ordered release of the mobile upon execution of a Rs. 10,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the applicant cannot sell, transfer, or use it further in any offense, and must produce it whenever required during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts