Prabhash Vasiram Sarakar vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Mulchera Advocate - APP — 32/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHGA090002202026
e-Filing Number
04-02-2026
Filing Number
204/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
32/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prabhash Vasiram Sarakar
Adv. CHILANGE VASANT GOVINDA
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Mulchera Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
Disposed
Order
Hearing
Reply/Say
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Order |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 04-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Prabhash Vasiram Sarakar's application under Section 503 BNSS for release of his seized Hero Splendor motorcycle (MH 34 K 9746). The court held that since the vehicle is movable property subject to decay and the investigation was complete, retaining it served no purpose; prosecution's fair trial rights could be protected through conditions. The vehicle was released on a Rs. 30,000 indemnity bond with restrictions against transfer, alteration, or misuse, and the IO was directed to prepare detailed panchanama with photographs for the charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed Prabhash Vasiram Sarakar's application under Section 503 BNSS for release of his seized Hero Splendor motorcycle (MH 34 K 9746). The court held that since the vehicle is movable property subject to decay and the investigation was complete, retaining it served no purpose; prosecution's fair trial rights could be protected through conditions. The vehicle was released on a Rs. 30,000 indemnity bond with restrictions against transfer, alteration, or misuse, and the IO was directed to prepare detailed panchanama with photographs for the charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts