Homdeo Raghunath Gawhare vs Ramdas Raghunath Gawhare Advocate - V.G.Chilange — 6/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHGA090002022022

Evidence

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

19/2022

Filing Date

15-03-2022

Registration No

6/2022

Registration Date

15-03-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi

Judge

10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Homdeo Raghunath Gawhare

Adv. Kanchan R.Mhashakhetri

Respondent(s)

Ramdas Raghunath Gawhare Advocate - V.G.Chilange

Jiwandas Raghunath Gawhare

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

23-04-2026

Evidence

02-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

26-02-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

01-07-2023
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Homdeo Raghunath Gawhare v. Ramdas Raghunath Gawhare & Jivandas Raghunath Gawhare (Civil Suit 6/2022) Outcome: The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the "no written statement" order and granted permission to file their written statement on record, subject to payment of Rs. 300 cost to the plaintiff. Key Facts: The plaintiff sought declaration of cancellation of a relinquishment deed and permanent prohibitory injunction. Defendants failed to file their written statement within 30 days of receiving summons (March 16, 2022), resulting in a no written statement order on January 18, 2023. They attributed the delay to unavailability of necessary documents and their earlier advocate's negligence. Reasoning: The court found sufficient cause for the delay, noting that litigants should not suffer due to advocates' acts and that courts liberally construe delays in filing written statements. Since defendants submitted their written statement with the application showing bonafide intention to contest, and granting permission would not prejudice the plaintiff, the court allowed the application in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Homdeo Raghunath Gawhare v. Ramdas Raghunath Gawhare & Jivandas Raghunath Gawhare (Civil Suit 6/2022) Outcome: The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the "no written statement" order and granted permission to file their written statement on record, subject to payment of Rs. 300 cost to the plaintiff. Key Facts: The plaintiff sought declaration of cancellation of a relinquishment deed and permanent prohibitory injunction. Defendants failed to file their written statement within 30 days of receiving summons (March 16, 2022), resulting in a no written statement order on January 18, 2023. They attributed the delay to unavailability of necessary documents and their earlier advocate's negligence. Reasoning: The court found sufficient cause for the delay, noting that litigants should not suffer due to advocates' acts and that courts liberally construe delays in filing written statements. Since defendants submitted their written statement with the application showing bonafide intention to contest, and granting permission would not prejudice the plaintiff, the court allowed the application in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case