Gangubai Balluji Atram vs Lata Tirupati Atram Advocate - S.D.Bhadke — 46/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
M.J.Cases - Misc. Judicial Cases
CNR: MHGA090001162022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
16/2022
Filing Date
17-02-2022
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gangubai Balluji Atram
Adv. K.T.Munghate
Balluji Bucha Atram
Respondent(s)
Lata Tirupati Atram Advocate - S.D.Bhadke
Bhargavi Tirupati Atram
Aaditya Tirupati Atram
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Evidence
Lok-Nyayalaya
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 09-04-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 14-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 46/2026 Outcome: The court allowed the application of non-applicants 2 and 3 (Bhargavi and Aaditya Tirupati Atram) to file their written statement, subject to payment of Rs. 300 as cost to the applicant. The written statement must be filed by 06-12-2025, with cost payment being a mandatory condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 46/2026 Outcome: The court allowed the application of non-applicants 2 and 3 (Bhargavi and Aaditya Tirupati Atram) to file their written statement, subject to payment of Rs. 300 as cost to the applicant. The written statement must be filed by 06-12-2025, with cost payment being a mandatory condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts