Supriya Rahul Vadgure vs Rahul Tukaram Vadgure Advocate - Annamma Garvasis — 2/2024

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHGA090000242024

Evidence

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

17-01-2024

Filing Number

18/2024

Filing Date

18-01-2024

Registration No

2/2024

Registration Date

18-01-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi

Judge

10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

Supriya Rahul Vadgure

Adv. LODALLIWAR NITESH UMAKANT

Abhira Rahul Vadgure

Adv. LODALLIWAR NITESH UMAKANT

Respondent(s)

Rahul Tukaram Vadgure Advocate - Annamma Garvasis

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi

16-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

06-01-2026

Evidence

04-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 2/2024 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chamorshi partly allowed the domestic violence application filed by Supriya Rahul Wadgure and her child against husband Rahul Tukaram Wadgure. The court found prima-facie evidence of domestic violence and economic abuse, establishing the applicants as aggrieved persons. The court ordered the respondent to pay monthly interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 to the wife and Rs. 1,000 to the child from the date of the order, and issued a temporary protection order prohibiting further acts of domestic violence. The request to restrain property alienation was denied due to insufficient evidence of any claimed share in the respondent's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 2/2024 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chamorshi partly allowed the domestic violence application filed by Supriya Rahul Wadgure and her child against husband Rahul Tukaram Wadgure. The court found prima-facie evidence of domestic violence and economic abuse, establishing the applicants as aggrieved persons. The court ordered the respondent to pay monthly interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 to the wife and Rs. 1,000 to the child from the date of the order, and issued a temporary protection order prohibiting further acts of domestic violence. The request to restrain property alienation was denied due to insufficient evidence of any claimed share in the respondent's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case