Sharda Ganpat Shivala vs Ravi Kistayya Uppula Advocate - S.S.Chittawar — 36/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGA080005102023
Filing Number
88/2023
Filing Date
26-10-2023
Registration No
36/2023
Registration Date
26-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Sironcha
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sharda Ganpat Shivala
Adv. Anantreddy S Pottala
Respondent(s)
Ravi Kistayya Uppula Advocate - S.S.Chittawar
Madhukar Kistayya Uppula
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Bapu Kistayya Appaji
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 36/2023 Summary The Civil Judge at Sironcha dismissed the suit filed by Sharda Ganpat Shivala against Ravi Kistayya Uppula Advocate and others for default. The plaintiff was consistently absent despite a prior court order dated 21/02/2026 directing her to lead evidence, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case and failure to take any steps to advance it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 36/2023 Summary The Civil Judge at Sironcha dismissed the suit filed by Sharda Ganpat Shivala against Ravi Kistayya Uppula Advocate and others for default. The plaintiff was consistently absent despite a prior court order dated 21/02/2026 directing her to lead evidence, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case and failure to take any steps to advance it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts