State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Sironcha vs Hakim Rasul Sayyad Advocate - Firoj Khan Khaseem Khan — 273/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E),83. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA080004422024
Filing Number
364/2024
Filing Date
23-09-2024
Registration No
273/2024
Registration Date
23-09-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Sironcha
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
07
Police Station
Sironcha
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Sironcha
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Hakim Rasul Sayyad Advocate - Firoj Khan Khaseem Khan
Toushik Baba Khan
Adv. Firoj Khan Khaseem Khan
Ajij Bhalim Sayad
Adv. Firoj Khan Khaseem Khan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Disposed
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | B.W._Unready |
| 14-01-2026 | B.W._Unready |
| 24-11-2025 | B.W._Unready |
| 16-09-2025 | B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 273/2024 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sironcha, stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against three accused (Hakim Rasul Sayad, Taushik Baba Khan, and Ajij Bhalim Sayad) charged under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Sections 65(e) and 83. The court found that despite multiple opportunities over nearly four years since the alleged offense on 19/01/2024, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's appearance, making continued proceedings unjustifiable. All three accused were discharged from charges with liberty granted to the prosecution to revive the matter if circumstances change. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 273/2024 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sironcha, stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against three accused (Hakim Rasul Sayad, Taushik Baba Khan, and Ajij Bhalim Sayad) charged under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Sections 65(e) and 83. The court found that despite multiple opportunities over nearly four years since the alleged offense on 19/01/2024, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's appearance, making continued proceedings unjustifiable. All three accused were discharged from charges with liberty granted to the prosecution to revive the matter if circumstances change. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts