State of Maharashtra vs Bhimrao Ankayya Bhaktu Advocate - Tirupati J Kondagorlla — 31/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324. Status: N.B.W._Ready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA080003122016
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
303/2016
Filing Date
28-06-2016
Registration No
31/2016
Registration Date
28-06-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Sironcha
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
Gadchiroli
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Bhimrao Ankayya Bhaktu Advocate - Tirupati J Kondagorlla
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 15-01-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 25-11-2025 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 18-09-2025 | N.B.W._Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bhimrao Ankayya Bhaktu Advocate (31/2016) This case involves proceedings before a First Class Magistrate in Sironia, Maharashtra, dated September 26, 2019. The document contains witness examination statements (Vishkharit Kramank 42 and 43) recorded in Marathi, wherein two witnesses provided testimony regarding alleged criminal incidents. Both witnesses denied having direct knowledge of the alleged incidents and stated they could not identify specific details about when or where the incidents occurred. The petitioner's (State of Maharashtra's) counsel and the respondent's counsel cross-examined the witnesses. The court's orders on the substantive petition were not granted; the examination of witnesses resulted in admissions regarding lack of evidence or witness credibility issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bhimrao Ankayya Bhaktu Advocate (31/2016) This case involves proceedings before a First Class Magistrate in Sironia, Maharashtra, dated September 26, 2019. The document contains witness examination statements (Vishkharit Kramank 42 and 43) recorded in Marathi, wherein two witnesses provided testimony regarding alleged criminal incidents. Both witnesses denied having direct knowledge of the alleged incidents and stated they could not identify specific details about when or where the incidents occurred. The petitioner's (State of Maharashtra's) counsel and the respondent's counsel cross-examined the witnesses. The court's orders on the substantive petition were not granted; the examination of witnesses resulted in admissions regarding lack of evidence or witness credibility issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts