State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Asaralli vs Naresh Bramhachari Kandakuri Advocate - K.V.Tokalwar — 143/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304,(a),279. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 28th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA080002392024
Filing Number
195/2024
Filing Date
11-06-2024
Registration No
143/2024
Registration Date
11-06-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Sironcha
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
104
Police Station
Sironcha
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Asaralli
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Naresh Bramhachari Kandakuri Advocate - K.V.Tokalwar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Naresh Brahamachari Kandakuri (Case 143/2024) The court acquitted accused Naresh Brahamachari Kandakuri of charges under IPC Sections 304-A (death by negligence) and 279 (rash driving), and Motor Vehicle Act Section 3/180 (driving without valid license), finding the prosecution failed to prove essential elements beyond reasonable doubt. Despite 11 witnesses being examined, only investigating officers testified against the accused; crucially, no eye witness corroborated that the accused was driving the motorcycle involved in the fatal collision, and the informant herself admitted having no knowledge of who struck her father. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Naresh Brahamachari Kandakuri (Case 143/2024) The court acquitted accused Naresh Brahamachari Kandakuri of charges under IPC Sections 304-A (death by negligence) and 279 (rash driving), and Motor Vehicle Act Section 3/180 (driving without valid license), finding the prosecution failed to prove essential elements beyond reasonable doubt. Despite 11 witnesses being examined, only investigating officers testified against the accused; crucially, no eye witness corroborated that the accused was driving the motorcycle involved in the fatal collision, and the informant herself admitted having no knowledge of who struck her father. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts