Rajakka Lachanna Narvedi vs Ramnna Ashalu Akula Advocate - Tirupati J Kondagorlla — 3/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 5,38. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGA080001202022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
13/2022
Filing Date
21-02-2022
Registration No
3/2022
Registration Date
21-02-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Sironcha
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajakka Lachanna Narvedi
Adv. J..M.KONDAGORLA
Respondent(s)
Ramnna Ashalu Akula Advocate - Tirupati J Kondagorlla
Santosh Maranna Akula
Vimla Maranna Akula
Adv. Tirupati J Kondagorlla
Samakka Sagar Senchala
Sarakka Shankar Isampelli
Marnna Venkanna Bachchalkura
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Rajkumar Rambhau Puththawar
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Laxmi Pochayya Baddi
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Sujata Shriniwas Kolluri
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 3/2022 Court: District Civil Court (Junior Level), Sirsocha, Gadchiroli District, Maharashtra Petitioner: Rajakka Lachanna Narvedi Respondents: Ramnna Ashalu Akula, Santosh Maranna Akula, Vimla Maranna Akula, and others Outcome: The petition was admitted and case adjourned for further proceedings. The court directed that respondents 6-9 must not transfer the disputed joint property to any third party without court permission pending final adjudication. The court ordered examination of documents and reserved final judgment on the substantive property division claim involving 1/2 share of agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 3/2022 Court: District Civil Court (Junior Level), Sirsocha, Gadchiroli District, Maharashtra Petitioner: Rajakka Lachanna Narvedi Respondents: Ramnna Ashalu Akula, Santosh Maranna Akula, Vimla Maranna Akula, and others Outcome: The petition was admitted and case adjourned for further proceedings. The court directed that respondents 6-9 must not transfer the disputed joint property to any third party without court permission pending final adjudication. The court ordered examination of documents and reserved final judgment on the substantive property division claim involving 1/2 share of agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts