State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Asaralli vs Raghu Basvayya Kallem — 62/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGA080001072026

Filing Number

85/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Divion , Sironcha

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Asarali

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Asaralli

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Raghu Basvayya Kallem

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Raghu Basvayya Kallem (62/2026) The First Class Magistrate Court in Sirsoccha convicted respondent Raghu Basvayya Kallem under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 for rash or negligent conduct with a vehicle (bearing registration TS-37-T-0240) on National Highway 63 near Ankisua on March 9, 2026. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 and two days imprisonment in default of payment, finding the charges duly proved against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
12-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
12-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Raghu Basvayya Kallem (62/2026) The First Class Magistrate Court in Sirsoccha convicted respondent Raghu Basvayya Kallem under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 for rash or negligent conduct with a vehicle (bearing registration TS-37-T-0240) on National Highway 63 near Ankisua on March 9, 2026. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 and two days imprisonment in default of payment, finding the charges duly proved against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.