State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Asaralli vs Bhagwan Samayya Kummari — 57/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA080001022026
Filing Number
80/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Sironcha
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
Asarali
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Asaralli
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Bhagwan Samayya Kummari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 57/2026 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate convicted respondent Bhagwan Samayya Kummari under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, for rash or negligent driving on National Highway 63 in Ankisaa on 10.03.2026. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 500 with an alternative sentence of two days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. Key Reasoning: The respondent admitted to the offense and pleaded guilty. The court considered his statement and the case documents, finding sufficient grounds to proceed with conviction. The offense involved the rash or negligent operation of a vehicle (MH-33-T-2640) on the highway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 57/2026 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate convicted respondent Bhagwan Samayya Kummari under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, for rash or negligent driving on National Highway 63 in Ankisaa on 10.03.2026. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 500 with an alternative sentence of two days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. Key Reasoning: The respondent admitted to the offense and pleaded guilty. The court considered his statement and the case documents, finding sufficient grounds to proceed with conviction. The offense involved the rash or negligent operation of a vehicle (MH-33-T-2640) on the highway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts