Chiranjiv Kishtayya Sodari vs Investigation Officer PSO Sironcha. Advocate - APP — 14/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHGA080000842026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

65/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

14/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Divion , Sironcha

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Chiranjiv Kishtayya Sodari

Adv. POTTALA ANANTREDDY SAMMAIAH

Respondent(s)

Investigation Officer PSO Sironcha. Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha

24-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Hearing

16-03-2026

Hearing

12-03-2026

Hearing

10-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 14/2026 Chiranjiv Kishtayya Sodari v. Investigation Officer PSO Sironcha The court granted the petitioner's application seeking return of a seized Honda City vehicle (Registration: MH-33-R-6959) under Section 503 of the CrPC in criminal case 39/2026. The court found that the petitioner had established ownership through documentation and that retention of the vehicle was not necessary for investigation; consequently, the court ordered release of the vehicle upon a ₹70,000 bond and directed the petitioner to refrain from any use of the vehicle pending trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 14/2026 Chiranjiv Kishtayya Sodari v. Investigation Officer PSO Sironcha The court granted the petitioner's application seeking return of a seized Honda City vehicle (Registration: MH-33-R-6959) under Section 503 of the CrPC in criminal case 39/2026. The court found that the petitioner had established ownership through documentation and that retention of the vehicle was not necessary for investigation; consequently, the court ordered release of the vehicle upon a ₹70,000 bond and directed the petitioner to refrain from any use of the vehicle pending trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Divion , Sironcha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case