Chiranjiv Kishtayya Sodari vs Investigation Officer PSO Sironcha. Advocate - APP — 14/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHGA080000842026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
65/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Sironcha
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chiranjiv Kishtayya Sodari
Adv. POTTALA ANANTREDDY SAMMAIAH
Respondent(s)
Investigation Officer PSO Sironcha. Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 14/2026 Chiranjiv Kishtayya Sodari v. Investigation Officer PSO Sironcha The court granted the petitioner's application seeking return of a seized Honda City vehicle (Registration: MH-33-R-6959) under Section 503 of the CrPC in criminal case 39/2026. The court found that the petitioner had established ownership through documentation and that retention of the vehicle was not necessary for investigation; consequently, the court ordered release of the vehicle upon a ₹70,000 bond and directed the petitioner to refrain from any use of the vehicle pending trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 14/2026 Chiranjiv Kishtayya Sodari v. Investigation Officer PSO Sironcha The court granted the petitioner's application seeking return of a seized Honda City vehicle (Registration: MH-33-R-6959) under Section 503 of the CrPC in criminal case 39/2026. The court found that the petitioner had established ownership through documentation and that retention of the vehicle was not necessary for investigation; consequently, the court ordered release of the vehicle upon a ₹70,000 bond and directed the petitioner to refrain from any use of the vehicle pending trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts