Posakka Shankarayya Durgam vs Rambai Kishhtaya Mudmadigela Advocate - Anantreddy S Pottala — 2/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 5,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGA080000142021
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
5/2021
Filing Date
13-01-2021
Registration No
2/2021
Registration Date
13-01-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion , Sironcha
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Posakka Shankarayya Durgam
Adv. J..M.KONDAGORLA
Suguna Yerayya Mudmdigela
Adv. J..M.KONDAGORLA
Chinnakka Pocham Jimade
Adv. J..M.KONDAGORLA
Respondent(s)
Rambai Kishhtaya Mudmadigela Advocate - Anantreddy S Pottala
Swami Yerayya Mudmadigela
Ramulu Yerayya Mudmadigela
Pochhana Malayya Mudmdigela
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Gourakka Madnayya Gumpula
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Bodakka Rajaram Kaveri
Adv. S.S.Chittawar-MAH/548/
Sadavali Narayan Mudmadigela
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Vyenktesh Narayan Mudmdigela
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Samakka Narayan Mudmadigela
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Vyenkatamma Tirupati Durgam
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Samakka Atela
Posakka Lasmaya Sonari
Adv. S.S.Chittawar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn.J.M.F.C. Sironcha
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Posakka Durgam & Others v. Rambai Mudmadigela & Others Outcome: The court allowed defendants 4-12's application to file their written statement and set aside the previous order that had proceeded without their written statement. The court accepted their delay was due to COVID-19 impacts and the difficulty in contacting multiple defendants in different locations. The written statement is now part of the suit pleadings in this partition case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Posakka Durgam & Others v. Rambai Mudmadigela & Others Outcome: The court allowed defendants 4-12's application to file their written statement and set aside the previous order that had proceeded without their written statement. The court accepted their delay was due to COVID-19 impacts and the difficulty in contacting multiple defendants in different locations. The written statement is now part of the suit pleadings in this partition case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts