State of Maharashtra Through PSO Aheri vs Pravin Gattu Anguwar Advocate - U.S.Galbale — 298/2019
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),83. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA070008622019
Filing Number
730/2019
Filing Date
22-11-2019
Registration No
298/2019
Registration Date
22-11-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
175
Police Station
Aheri
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Aheri
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Pravin Gattu Anguwar Advocate - U.S.Galbale
Adarsh Ashok Yelpulwar
Sanjay Bapu Sudhar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pravin Gattu Anguwar & Others (2019) Decision: All three accused were acquitted of charges under sections 65(a) and 83 of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical evidentiary gaps, including failure to examine the panch witness, absence of chemical analysis proof, and missing batch numbers and manufacturing dates on seized liquor bottles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pravin Gattu Anguwar & Others (2019) Decision: All three accused were acquitted of charges under sections 65(a) and 83 of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical evidentiary gaps, including failure to examine the panch witness, absence of chemical analysis proof, and missing batch numbers and manufacturing dates on seized liquor bottles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts