State of Maharashtra Through PSO Etapalli vs Komalsingh Jagatsingh Girase Advocate - S.V.Jainwar — 84/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,323,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA070007652024
Filing Number
662/2024
Filing Date
03-10-2024
Registration No
84/2024
Registration Date
03-10-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0031
Police Station
Etapalli
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Etapalli
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Komalsingh Jagatsingh Girase Advocate - S.V.Jainwar
Yogesh Tryambak Chendkale
Adv. S.V.Jainwar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 29-01-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 84/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants, Komalsingh Jagatsingh Girase and Yogesh Tryambak Chendkale, of charges under IPC Sections 294 (obscene language), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506 (criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, relying primarily on the complainant's testimony without independent corroboration from other witnesses present at the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 84/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants, Komalsingh Jagatsingh Girase and Yogesh Tryambak Chendkale, of charges under IPC Sections 294 (obscene language), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506 (criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, relying primarily on the complainant's testimony without independent corroboration from other witnesses present at the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts