State of Maharashtra Through PSO Aheri vs Santosh Ramayya Mudaswar Advocate - S.V.Jainwar — 137/2019
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a), 83. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 28th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA070007522019
Filing Number
639/2019
Filing Date
19-Oct-2019
Registration No
137/2019
Registration Date
19-Oct-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
178
Police Station
Aheri
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Aheri
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Santosh Ramayya Mudaswar Advocate - S.V.Jainwar
-
2.Mahesh Madhukar Bhimojwar
-
3.Tirupati Rajayya Bomanwar
-
4.Prakash Laxman Singner
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 137/2019 Court Decision: All four accused (Santosh Ramayya Mudaswar, Mahesh Madhukar Bhimojwar, Tirupati Rajayya Bomanwar, and Prakash Lakshman Singner) were acquitted and discharged of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Sections 65(a) and 83. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt despite seizing 80 bottles of Imperial Blue liquor. Critical evidentiary gaps included: the investigating officer's statement was not recorded in court; the only panch witness admitted to being a police station computer operator, compromising his credibility; and no independent witness corroborated the seizure. Without the investigating officer's testimony and relying solely on police and interested witnesses, the court found insufficient credible evidence to prove the offense, warranting acquittal under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
12-Mar-2026
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
20-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
17-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
09-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
20-Dec-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
18-Nov-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
30-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
20-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
05-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
05-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
22-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
20-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
03-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
10-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
15-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
05-Jun-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
23-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
18-Mar-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
26-Feb-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
09-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
06-Dec-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
19-Oct-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
20-Sep-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
08-Aug-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
21-Jun-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
19-Apr-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
13-Mar-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
31-Jan-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
19-Dec-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
07-Nov-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
17-Sep-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
16-Aug-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
02-Jun-2022
Evidence
-
19-Apr-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
11-Feb-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
14-Dec-2021
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
16-Nov-2021
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
04-Oct-2021
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
14-Jul-2021
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
29-May-2021
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
09-Mar-2021
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
19-Jan-2021
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
31-Oct-2020
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
19-Aug-2020
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
09-Jun-2020
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
20-Apr-2020
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
28-Feb-2020
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
28-Jan-2020
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
07-Jan-2020
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
03-Dec-2019
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
-
19-Oct-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Oct-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 137/2019
Case Summary: 137/2019 Court Decision: All four accused (Santosh Ramayya Mudaswar, Mahesh Madhukar Bhimojwar, Tirupati Rajayya Bomanwar, and Prakash Lakshman Singner) were acquitted and discharged of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Sections 65(a) and 83. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt despite seizing 80 bottles of Imperial Blue liquor. Critical evidentiary gaps included: the investigating officer's statement was not recorded in court; the only panch witness admitted to being a police station computer operator, compromising his credibility; and no independent witness corroborated the seizure. Without the investigating officer's testimony and relying solely on police and interested witnesses, the court found insufficient credible evidence to prove the offense, warranting acquittal under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts