Sunita Ashish Chandekar vs Ashish Shrawan Chandekar — 14/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHGA070005852023
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
519/2023
Filing Date
25-07-2023
Registration No
14/2023
Registration Date
25-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Divion ,Aheri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunita Ashish Chandekar
Adv. Sou. Swati S.Jainwar
Samruddhi Ashish Chandekar
Adv. Sou. Swati S.Jainwar
Respondent(s)
Ashish Shrawan Chandekar
Shrawan Laxman Chandekar
Sumitra Shrawan Chandekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Aheri.
Evidence
Evidence
Lok-Nyayalaya
Evidence
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 14-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: PWDVA No. 14/2023 The court granted interim maintenance to the applicants under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. Respondent no.1 (husband) was directed to pay Rs. 3,000 per month to each applicant (wife and daughter) from the date of filing the application until final disposal. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence including economic abuse, noting the respondent's failure to provide affidavit of income and his avoidance of maintenance responsibility despite being employed as a Kotwal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: PWDVA No. 14/2023 The court granted interim maintenance to the applicants under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. Respondent no.1 (husband) was directed to pay Rs. 3,000 per month to each applicant (wife and daughter) from the date of filing the application until final disposal. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence including economic abuse, noting the respondent's failure to provide affidavit of income and his avoidance of maintenance responsibility despite being employed as a Kotwal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts